> From: talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:49:09 +0000 > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:49:00 -0500 > From: Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> > To: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > Cc: "talk@openstreetmap.org" <talk@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Native American/First Nation, etc. Reservation > Boundaries > Message-ID: > <CAMPM96pie6-db=tOkPESR6KGPHQmf-Oiz0OoqXjFAHdEj=4...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Am 21/apr/2013 um 19:59 schrieb Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org: > > > Is rendering the issue or tagging? > > Yes. > > IMHO we should get the tagging right and rendering will follow. As we > > don't have similar situations in Europe it is unlikely that this is already > > implemented > > > I still maintain Scotland, North Ireland and Wales are analogous > situations. Martin,Although GB seems to be different to the USA, the basis is > an agreement isnt it ? The tribal borders will however cross admin state > borders since the tribal area's or countries do have a wider range.Greetz >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
