On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:39:16PM +0000, Pierre Béland wrote: > Thrue, this is a good practice to save often. At the same time we need that > changeset infos be grouped and more informative to help the community better > follow the edits. How to do that? > > The first step would be by default for the editors to leave the changeset > open until a new comment is provided or when the mapper ask specifically to > close the changeset. This would avoid one changeset per building as I saw > many times. And yes, we should insist to have comments. > > The second step, the editors should prompt for a comment.
would it be technically doable that the JOSM and ID would automatically generate a short summary of the changes, something like 3 highway edited, 10000 waterways deleted, 50 tag only changes would become "3he,1000wd,50t" after which the user could provide a more generic additional comment. Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
