Hi Alex, Good question and I have since figured out how to access notes I have touched/resolved to demonstrate my point. My treatment of notes is probably the problem. :)
I see this note [1] as being a legitimate use case for them in that there used to be a roundabout there and not the intersection has been reconfigured (ie. OSM is "in error") I see this note [2] as being an illegitimate use case for them. (ie. OSM is NOT "in error" rather OSM is "missing" this data). You can see how I have tried to encourage the user to engage with OSM. Note [3] is similar to Note [2] but my treatment has been to resolve with the comment I have made (At the detriment of a future OSM editor?). This is one of my earlier note exercises. [1]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/6598 [2]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/118639 [3]: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/99910 I think the notes are great and I've used them in areas where I have passed through and noted obvious errors for local mappers. With the 4sq channel though I'm wondering if my logic and subsequent action to resolve is too literal and I should leave Notes of Type [2] / [3] in place. Is this the intent of Notes moving forward? Cheers, Jason On 28 March 2014 13:05, Alex Barth <a...@mapbox.com> wrote: > Hey Jason - > > I'm not sure I follow as Foursquare's page says: > > "If you just want something small fixed but don't have the time to sign up > and edit, it's easy to add a note." > > Which seems to be in line with how you're using notes (reporting errors). > What am I missing? > >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
