Then the bitcoin aspect is more a tagging issue: they accept bitcoin through
menufy.com only.
On 30 avril 2014 02:03:00 UTC+02:00, Andreas Goss <andi...@t-online.de> wrote:
>Am 4/30/14 01:18 , schrieb Simon Poole:
>> I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it
>
>I think that is a pretty important aspect considering that CoinMap
>seems
>to be pretty popular in the Bitcoin community. But if users end up
>going
>to restaurants where they can't pay with Bitcoin and the owner does not
>
>even know what Bitcoins are they are going to be get frustrated and use
>
>alternative services. Which then also means that there is less
>initiative for business owners accepting Bitcoin to make sure they are
>(correctly) listed on OpenStreetMap.
>
>Considering CoinMap has 4000+ listing (according to some recent
>articles) then 700 wrong listings are a significant amount of bad data
>(assuming most of the stores do indeed not accept Bitcoin at they
>physical location).
>
>Andi
>
>PS: I honestly didn't even consider the overall legal aspect of this.
>
>__________
>openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
>wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
