On 18/02/2015 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I've tried some foot routing out and it appears that someone has done a mass
addition of access=private to large numbers of ROWs in Hampshire.
See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.96550%2C-1.17800%3B50.96090%2C-1.18780#map=17/50.96265/-1.18302
See also
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/41053/prow-tagging-england-wales
In this case graphhopper's "correct", because
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4453997 does not have "foot=yes" on it,
but instead "access:foot=yes". It used to have foot=designated on it
until 3 years ago.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
