On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Greg Knisely <g...@mapzen.com> wrote: > >> From a routing/driving directions perspective, I was hoping to determine >> if the user needs to slow down at all where a toll exists if they use an >> ETC device. >> > > That would be a short segment of maxspeed=25mph or whatever. Open road > tolling would have a constant maxspeed. > > Each functional element should have it's own tag: when too much is > implicit it creates problems down the road. For example the same ETC > device may be open road in some areas, require a slow approach elsewhere, > and in yet another place involve stopping for a toll taker. > Agreed. Just off the top of my head I can think of examples of every situation Bryce mentioned: On the Creek Turnpike, traffic sails through at full speed on the PIKEPASS lanes <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83003432>. The Muskogee Turnpike winds up with a rare example of per-lane speed limits in the US for PIKEPASS to bypass the toll plaza at speed <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205585571>. Meanwhile, on The Cimarron Turnpike at the Noble toll plaza, which also has an exit to US 177, PIKEPASS traffic slows down if it's staying on the turnpike <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226015008>, but all traffic exiting or entering at US 177, or through traffic that needs tourism information or a cash receipt, stops on the turnpike <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226015011>. Meanwhile Locust Grove has a stop sign <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1116722237>, but it generally goes unenforced if you don't trigger the violation alarm, so most PIKEPASS users California roll that one at like, 40 MPH.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
