18. maj 2015 10.30 pop. je oseba "Andrew Guertin" <andrew.guer...@uvm.edu> napisala: > Whether the new limits are sufficiently high for OSM I haven't investigated enough to answer.
Browser limits, network speeds and screen resolutions all increased in the recent years, but tile size stayed at 256*256. To put this in perspective, currently trending 1920*1080 needs 40-54 tiles for a full screen map, whereas 1024*768 (most popular in 2009) only needed 12-20. Source: http:// <http://www.screenresolution.org/>www.screenresolution.org/ <http://www.screenresolution.org/> + quick calculation. Average tile complexity also increased somewhat, increasing their average size in kB. Using a,b,c hostname aliases only increases initial DNS resolution time. This hack IMO still serves as a relatively cheap performance boost... until HTTP 2 is widely used. best regards, Stefan
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
