On 14/08/2015 10:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 14.08.2015 um 05:09 schrieb Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com>:
We allow original research and expert testimony.
So, is OSM to contain only the obvious that everyone can see? Or
should it contain everything that can be seen?
well spoken, I see this like you and would appreciate if we could change our
recommendations from: in doubt delete to in doubt keep it.
Where there is doubt, do nothing! Doubt should be removed before acting, asking
the originator may remove doubt.
And: ask the originator before deleting/changing stuff you don't understand or
are unsure about, especially if it is concerning a special interest topic.
Where "understanding" may require specialist knowledge it is even more
imperative not to delete.
cheers
Martin
PS: I also agree that shut the hell up is not acceptable language in a
community, while it is somehow suitable to underline the anger ;-)
_______________________________________________
Denying someone their input is contrary to the "Open" part of OSM! Rather a
need to communicate untill the issue is resolved would be better.
"Speak up!" rather than "Shut up".
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
