sent from a phone
> Am 20.08.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > > where is the railway here ? were are the rails ? there aren't any rails, but there is a railbed, this cutting wouldn't make sense for a cycleway, would it? (inappropriate effort) > why should we keep > any mention about "rails" when it's a cycleway now ? because it's a cycleway in a railbed? > map what we see, > the path or track and the cuttings/embankments. map what we see does not mean to only look the next 2 meters in front of you. There clearly is an artificial cutting and if you look at this in a bigger context you (or at least someone else who neither isn't a railway expert) can likely understand that this is a former railway. railway=dismantled means there is no railway currently but there are clear traces / remains of a railway (because if there weren't we would not put it in Osm). How do you "see" that a highway is primary? without looking at a bigger picture you won't. if we mapped like you suggest, we would only map highway=road... cheers Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
