http://beta.mapquest.com/ does not use OSM data in the US, at least.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joseph Reeves <iknowjos...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://hello.mapquest.com/ ? > > On 14 September 2015 at 19:25, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > >> I had an idea to add UMap functionality to OSM.org website and I >> discovered Mateusz Konieczny lately wanted to add a dynamic layer with >> opening hours (and some more data), which I think would be also useful for >> users: >> >> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1038 >> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1056 >> >> However the response we got is that all the features on our website are >> there because they help mappers. While I'm sure overlay showing opening >> hours falls into this category easily, map personalization is primary a >> feature for end users (of course mappers may use it too, but it may not >> have direct impact on OSM data). >> >> This made me wonder if we care only for having portal for mappers and >> don't like to have some useful features just because they are addressed >> rather for data consumers? In most of the cases this is not the >> contradiction, but why should we "reject" end users' needs? >> >> OSM-carto, which is what I'm more familiar with, tries to reach both >> these groups: >> >> >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CARTOGRAPHY.md#purposes > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
