Mike Thompson <miketho16 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> Sometimes, such as in the case of the boundary between the US states of
Ohio and Kentucky, it is the low water mark on one bank[1] (in this case the
court held that it was the low water mark of the north bank of the Ohio
River in 1792, not the present low water mark of the north bank, and
therefore the boundary and the river should not share geometry in this case).

I've been guilty of mistakenly joining state boundaries to the Ohio River's
thalweg in the past, and by now I've had to correct those boundaries on
several occasions. It's unfortunate that few mappers are aware of these
complexities. The full situation is spelled out in a wiki page:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio_River

If any other natural features tend to attract misinformed edits, I suggest
writing up a similar page so you can easily point mappers to it in changeset
comments etc.

Ironically, I was recently involved in a minor car collision onboard a ferry
crossing this river. The police officer who responded had to call around to
verify that he had jurisdiction. Perhaps if his department had distributed
OSM-based maps, we could've been on our way a bit sooner. ;-)

-- 
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to