On 04/03/16 11:06, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Paying mappers should have a very intricate web of defined jobs and > reviewers. Ideally, OSM Tasking Manager should be used. "Map all forests > and roads in this square, I review, and you get 0.1 bitcoins". Anything > less strict is prone to misuse.
A mechanism that reduces entitlement for reverted activity is essential and I don't think the OSMANDLive process even acknowledges that. (and trim properly if you must top post please) > On 03/03/16 11:17, Marc Gemis wrote: > > If I understand the discussion on [1] correctly OsmAnd will reward > > mappers with bitcoins. The bitcoins seem to be paid via a formula > > based on the number of changesets you upload. > > > > I think this is a bad idea, (just like Jack Burke illustrates with the > > Dilbert strips in the linked topic). > > What do you think about this ? How should we deal with this ? > > http://osmand.net/osm_live#information seems to be the correct > information? Personally I would associate 'live' in relation to a > routing application to be live updates of traffic conditions, and I > could understand the monetising of that data, but this does not seem to > be addressing that particular problem at all? > > As someone actively contributing currently, while an income from that > would be welcome, I don't think this third party activity is helpful to > OSM! In the first instance I have no intention of contributing to > bitcoin since I think it's main reason for existence is to hid scammers > and until that secrecy is removed ... I will not be signing up ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
