>This looks like a manual cleanup operation.

I agree it needs a manual clean up I just wondered if there was a way to
identify any others floating around so they could be mannually inspected?

Thanks John

On 29 May 2016 at 19:57, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson <j...@betra.is> wrote:

> This is an import as we can see on the history of one of the nodes:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3696941268/history
>
> Notice in some cases the same housenumbers are valid! Based on the aerial
> images this is not the case here as the cadaster import seems to be for the
> building footprint, the lot footprint and boundary(?) or maybe this was
> originally planned as 3 different lots. This looks like a manual cleanup
> operation.
>
> A real world example of buildings having the same number because someone
> somewhere said it was ok: Dalvegur 18 (two different buildings with
> different businesses)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/64.10536/-21.87005
>
>
> --Jói
>
>
>
> Þann 29.5.2016 23:13, skrifaði john whelan:
>
>> I came across these locally whilst looking in JOSM for something else.
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87480616#map=18/45.47153/-75.51310
>>
>> Is there a tool to look for duplicate house numbers that are very close?
>>
>> I suspect an import of some type but more importantly is the problem of
>> cleaning up.
>>
>> They have the same values for
>> addr:city
>> addr:housenumber
>> addr:street
>>
>> though slightly different positions.  I suspect this might be a general
>> problem within OSM not just in Ottawa which is why I thought to ask the
>> question here.
>>
>> Thanks John
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to