On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:01:07PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2016-05-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com>: > > > often enough I get messages from people saying that drawing a bridge > > or culvert for every minor highway/waterway crossing causes more > > trouble than use and I tend to agree. > > > > > I disagree. Either there is a bridge / culvert in reality, and in this case > why wouldn't we want it in OSM, or there isn't and then it is a simple > error waiting to be corrected.
so what do you do if you drove along a track know there is not a single ford but don't have enough information to know whether there is a bridge or culvert in most places? There are some notable bridges but everything that is notable probably deserves at least a man_made=bridge anyway while the rest ist just I don't get wet feet here. > Which trouble do these elements cause? I realize they make it harder to > apply modifications to long (i.e. probably more pieces) ways, but on the > other hand, casual mistakes also don't extend very far. I have seen many examples of culverts applied to the wrong segment of the way.. theese seem to go easily unnoticed for long periods of time. Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
