[replying to the thread in general] I tend to be nervous about groups that are structurally like the DWG. However, when I look at what they've done over the years I've been involved, and the notion of the automated edits code, I have to say the DWG has seemed 100% reasonable and if anything slightly too restrained.
So while it's always healthy to have a little dissent/discussion, I don't think things are broken. Discussing real cases isb likely more useful and constructive than theory. So perhaps we can table the meta-discussion and bring up specific issues where people think they have overstepped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
