I think 2-5 meters per century is acceptable and means lat / long is an acceptable method but since some houses are less than this in width it would probably be an idea to refresh the address once in a while.
Cheerio John On 10 September 2016 at 15:02, Oleksiy Muzalyev <[email protected] > wrote: > On 10/09/16 20:46, john whelan wrote: > >> >> I see to recall that Australia is on the move. So it would seem that we >> should retain as much accuracy as possible then if we're a metre out it >> isn't quite so important. >> >> I think any generic addressing scheme is going to suffer from parts of >> the world moving though and it is a limitation we have to work with. From >> a practical point of view just grabbing a new address every decade would >> probably work fairly well. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> I wish an address could be more stable than a decade, as it should be > used also in property documents. If it is 2 - 5 meters per century, then it > is still acceptable. > > I wonder how "three words" services plan to deal with it? Recalculating > coordinates behind the scene? But in a century there will be probably no > these services, and no Internet as we know it. It is a lot of time. But > latitude and longitude will still exist. And it would be possible to > recalculate them taking into account the tectonic plates factual movement > to prove property rights. > > Best regards, > Oleksiy >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
