Sure there is no need or no urge to change a logo, no timeline neither, but
this proposal triggers a discussion, so let's see where it goes.
The image of the project is something that people can care of, why not?
I personally find the 'negative magnifier' elegant, and the disappearance of
the 0s and 1s a good way to simplify this logo and make it easier to scale.
When I see questions about horizontal layers in the Q&A site, I can't help
thinking that in some way we tend to be over in explaining the difference
between data vs map.
Yves
Le 15 octobre 2016 00:35:48 GMT+02:00, Michael Kugelmann <michaelk_...@gmx.de>
a écrit :
>On 14.10.2016 at 16:36 Elio Qoshi wrote:
>>
>> Based on the new Donation Initiative Logo, I thought it would be a
>> good time to discuss around adapting a new logo which is more
>suitable
>> for print, smaller displays and generally a broader variety of
>> backgrounds.
>>
>I guess you don't remember the heavy discussion ongoing while the last
>change of the OSM logo (and this was just a slight change). And please
>always remember that the people are used to something => there is a
>recognition value behind the old logo. Additionally all
>web-pages/flyers/etc. needs to be changed. There for I consider a
>change
>of the loggo w/o any needs as not at all the highest priority...
>
>
>Jst my 2 cents,
>Michael.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
