Sebastian Arcus wrote: > Well, looking at the map, it looks like each and every parcel of > land and section of field has a locality tag associated with it.
It's very common in the UK, too, for uninhabited sections of woodland and hillside to have placenames. > it still seems a bit odd - and begs the question if those tags > really need to be there. Why not? Be conservative in what you change/delete in OSM, be liberal in what you add. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Lot-s-of-locality-names-in-an-otherwise-empty-area-tp5886253p5886295.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
