Hi John, You can try one of the several tools proposed by Pascal Neis, that could fulfill part of your ideas.
In particular see: http://neis-one.org/2016/01/suspicious-osm/ http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious and other tools of interest at: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/ Cheers, -- althio On 31 December 2016 at 00:30, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > There has been some recent traffic about new users and the occasional > problems they cause. The recent traffic was about Pokemon. In HOT in > theory new users work is validated. In practise its only when a tile is > completed and even then most tiles aren't checked. > > Somewhere the number of edits and how long a mapper has been mapping are > stored. If we define inexperienced mappers as those who have made less than > 20 changesets and been registered for less than a month, the exact figures > optimum numbers need to be determined. > > Than is there a method whereby I can say within this boundary show me any > edits made by "inexperienced" mappers? > > It reduces the need to check every changeset for an area. I assume that > most vandalisation is done by accounts that would be considered > inexperienced mappers and we could gently guide the others towards the map > features page etc. If a mapper has a thousand changesets to their name and > been mapping more than three months I think we can assume their mapping will > contain fewer errors than an inexperienced mapper so there is less need to > double check them. > > On the HOT side it would help catch those new mappers who don't mark a tile > done. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > > Cheerio John > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
