One improvement/correction?: The wooded area South of Greyfield Wood:
https://lua.osm-carto.paulnorman.ca/#15/51.3189/-2.5230
Last edited 2 years ago. OSMI doesn't flag it up as a problem & it
appears to have just one shared start.end point.
Cycle/Transport/Human all render it.
DaveF .
On 31/01/2017 12:29, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2017, Dave F wrote:
What benefits does this bring to the end user zooming & panning
around? You've produced a demo so I presume there is one.
I think there is currently no comprehensive list of practical direct
effects this has.
The most significant ones are likely various differences in the way
polygons are interpreted and rendered.
Of these differences the most prominent one is probably due to loading
each multipolygon relation as a single feature into the rendering
database (osm2pgsql -G option) rather than splitting it into separate
components. This makes a strong difference w.r.t. rendering of labels
for administrative boundaries. However this is not mainly what we are
asking for feedback here since this is a change which is already well
known and well tested in its effects. We are also aware that this
change will likely require tuning the style in terms of label placement
in the long term - which is however not a point of concern right now.
Where feedback is most useful are the more suptle changes which will
only have a visible effect in a smaller number of situations. See the
PR Paul linked to for details. In particular it would be important to
know if there are situations where the new database schema leads to
incorrect mapper feedback through the the way things are rendered.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
