> > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oEm
Nice tool, thanks! Unfortunately it does not (yet)catch also the segregated and not-segregated foot-cycle-paths that are tagged using the JOSM presets (highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated, segregated=yes|no) I am not an Overpass-Turbo expert and don't dare to add them to your script. I would like to come to a common agreement and document that > highway=cycleway on distinct geometry is preferable to having just a > cycleway=track attribute on a road. In the past some of the separate > cycleways I had mapped have been deleted in favor of attributes on the > road. The latter is an inferior representation (IMHO) because: > > 1. it makes it harder to add more attributes to the cycleway (including > maxspeed, surface, turn restrictions, width, access restrictions) > > 2. it makes it unclear or at least much more error prone to determine which > attributes of the road also belong to the cycleway (and vice versa) > > 3. it removes the geometric details (position, shape, unclear position of > things between (or not) the cycleway and the road like grass, guard rails, > telephone booths, poles, crossings between driveways, etc.) > > Therefore I believe we should recommend that fixing duplicates as of this > thread should be done by removing the attribute cycleway=track, not > deleting the highway=cycleway. > I fully agree on this. Please do not remove separate cycleways, unless they are wrongly mapped cycle lanes (an error which I encounter from time to time)
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
