2017-05-07 9:30 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org>: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about a type=traffic_sign relation? >> >> Where traffic_sign could be stop, give_way, parking >> > > I was thinking the typical highway=* tags for highway=stop, > highway=traffic_signals and highway=give_way. > > >> In case of a stop sign, we could include the sign on a node, role 'sign'. >> The node of the intersection, maybe role 'to'. The way the vehicle is >> approaching from, maybe role 'from'. >> > > Yes, that's what I'm suggesting. > > >> In case of parking it would make very clear on which ways there is >> parking and we would have central place to keep track of the conditions >> like "opening_hours" and tariffs, or specific requirements like permits. >> > > Parking already has a very clear case of way tagging for this. >
To map the effect on the road network, I agree. To relate the traffic signs to those ways, we don't. I don't know if we'll be able to map all traffic signs and include all these relations (and keep them up-to-date), but then I also wasn't sure we´d be able to put entire countries on the map like we did, only ust a few years ago. It would be good to have a well thought out plan, so we can start doing it consistently. Polyglot
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
