On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:13:14AM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 28.10.2017 12:06, Andrew Hain wrote: > > His behaviour over the past years makes him a contributor of net > > negative value. > > I have to disagree here. He's probably the single most active wiki > contributor, and is also performing a lot of useful maintenance work > that no one else would bother doing.
Agree. At the same time, exactly as he is a respected and experienced contributor the cost of every single missstep is disproportionately higher than if "gaer3jfkk4ej555_I_want_to_fuck_OSM" does it. An exceptionally high self esteem regarding foreign language skills does not help either. ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/escada/diary/40120 ) > This does not mean that he should be exempt from the rules, of course. > To the contrary: What I would hope for is consistent enforcement of the > rules, with gradually increasing penalties. Jumping straight from spotty > enforcement to a permanent ban, though, seems wasteful and needlessly cruel. Rules can help - if they can be enforced by simple technical means. For some contributors lets say a limit like * 2 edits to a single page within 14 days * 5 edits to talk pages per 7 days * 1 revert per 14 days Nothing personal but very few people here have the time to follow dozens of changesets so this would help a lot. Maybe for some contributors a personal blacklist banning every edit with the word "you" in every language and declination can help. Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
