sent from a phone
> On 7. Nov 2017, at 03:22, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > > 3. What do you think about using OSM hillshading "fork" which could be > editable somehow to follow OSM data (of course it doesn't belong to OSM > database, since it's a raster data, not a vector one)? I’ve generally found very good correspondence between srtm and osm, in hilly areas the hillshading made the map much more readable, and especially the parts without trees growing on them made much more sense (as you could see that they were on the hilltops and oriented to the same direction). I can’t imagine editing height raster data based on osm though, how would you do it? This implies moving bits quite a lot probably, because you won’t even notice 5 or 10 meters in 30 or 90m grid data. I would expect global coverage 3D scan data to be more reliable than osm and would rather do the opposite (adjust osm to fit hillshading). _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
