On 30/11/17 13:46, Daniel Koć wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking about changes in rendering of protected areas on
osm-carto and I wanted to give community a hint, because it's a
popular kind of objects. There is a fresh discussion about it from
this comment on:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/603#issuecomment-347879897
In short:
1. Currently leisure=nature_reserve (old scheme) and boundary=* (new
scheme) are frequently tagged in parallel, and it looks like the old
scheme is used as a hack just to make it visible on default map.
(snipped)
Actually one more thing (prompted by SK53 on IRC) - the area of a nature
reserve is sometimes != the protected area, as noted here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/603#issuecomment-348480276
I can think of a few examples locally - one for example is signed as an
SSSI* but not a nature reserve:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53745064/history
also apparently the "reserve" area at Muston
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.9219/-0.7766 doesn't match the
protected area.
Obviously this is orthoganal to what gets rendered and what doesn't, but
there's certainly a case for using both tags.
Best Regards,
Andy
* Site of Special Scientific Interest. Probably maps onto a
"protect_class" or something.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
