Have you been in contact with the two contributors to see if they can
revoke/reupload?
I presume it came from a database. If it's still available it can be
amended as required.
DaveF
On 17/01/2018 23:33, Kevin Broderick wrote:
In Annapolis, Maryland, for instance:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158283000
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/157577529
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150949243
All of the points for which I've reviewed the history were created ten
years ago, edited nine years ago, by the same accounts, and have not
been updated since.
It seems the same issue was brought up on the forum a couple of years
ago (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53057), and the
suggestion was that landuse polygons were probably most appropriate,
and place=subdivision was next-best. I don't think I can effectively
armchair-map landuse in cities, but hamlets in densely populated areas
clearly don't meet the wiki definition (and, I'd argue, are distinct
on-the-ground situations; an isolated hamlet in a rural area is very
different than an urban neighbourhood or subdivision). I'm leaning
towards place=neighbourhood as being more correct than place=hamlet,
although it clearly leaves room for improvement in the form of proper
landuse polygons and local knowledge re: names.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
can you post some examples?
cheers,
Martin
--
Kevin Broderick
k...@kevinbroderick.com <mailto:k...@kevinbroderick.com>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
