Paul, For this application having a well defined region isn't a big issue. To me it's more of "if you are interested, here is a nearby OSM group(s)." I think as we learn how users react to the feature, we can find ways to improve it. To that end, I gave Metro Vancouver as an area to github issue. It probably should extend out more than just the metro relation but I felt it was a good start.
Clifford On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > On 3/31/2018 5:25 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: > >> a `.geojson` file to describe where the region where it is active. >> (multiple resources can share a .geojson file) >> > > I'm having trouble figuring out what a sensible region is for the meetups > in Vancouver and the Pacific Northwest. > > Our meetups are along the coast, but I don't believe there are any other > meetups for a few hundred km as you go inland. Closer to home, I'd consider > Chilliwack part of our region in many ways, but it's 100km from there to > our normal meeting place. This makes it too far to suggest, because it's a > 90+ minute drive. Where would I cut it off? > > Going up and down the coast, we have a different problem. Vancouver, > South-Central Salish Sea, and Seattle all share a meetup organization, and > have overlap in members. The boundaries here are fuzzy. > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
