Hi Mateusz, Am 2018-06-08 um 19:19 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > building=yes is a standard way to mark building without specifying its > type. Editors wishing to specify building type would (directly or > indirectly, for example using StreetComplete) look through buildings > tagged as building=yes. > > building=building is an unexpected way to mark building without > specifying its type and therefore retagging this duplicate to > building=yes would improve tagging without any information loss.
Did you investigate who used that tag and maybe why? Was it a bot, a editor preset, an import or manual user input? I would like to have this question answered before a mechanical edit. IMHO Any good mechanical edit correcting "wrong tagging" should do some investigation of that kind. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
