Hi
Short answer: Yes
There's a few problems here:
Relations should not be used to collect thing together.
There shouldn't be tags on the ways which conflict with those in the
relations
MP relations require a 'type' tags and 'inners' & 'outers' roles
In this case the Southern section shouldn't be a polygon
MP relations should be restricted to the areas which have inners:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2571440#map=19/51.15275/-2.05045
The Islet, in this case, isn't included in the relation.
There are no defined 'outers'
There should be a complimentary tag to natural=water, such as
water=stream/river etc.
Cheers
DaveF
On 19/09/2018 01:35, Jem wrote:
Is there any problem with defining a water feature that is a mix of
polygons & lines? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6447531
Should it be fixed, or is it ok?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
