Hi, On 01.10.2018 03:28, Nate Smith wrote: > Last week we > released a new version of a data quality monitoring tool
I would like to recommend that you don't use the term "quality monitoring tool" for this since you're measuring quantity not quality. At best, I'd call it a tool that monitors "richness" or "completeness". Simply counting how many features there are and how many of a pre-defined list of tags each one has shouldn't be called "quality monitoring", because there will be situations where the OpenStreetMap community requests of project managers (who your web site claims to be targeted at) that they implement some form of quality assurance; calling your statistics tool a "quality monitoring" tool runs the risk of making these people believe that quality requirements can be fulfilled by ensuring that enough tags are set, which is definitely not what the wider community would regard as a suitable quality assurance for a humanitarian data entry project. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
