Sorry messed up with interface, my reply was to Paul Norman but I didn't get his message so replied to a wrong email.
I mentionned Permanent id because OSM anyway failed to implement it or didn't want to have it with sequential id. Best Regards, Victor On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 16:13, Tomas Straupis <tomasstrau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you ealborate more on why you mention permanent id here? I see your > idea, but do not understand how it is connected to permanent id problem. > > There were some tests done regarding permanent id in Lithuania, but those > were regarding places of interest. > > If this has something in common, I could share some ideas and > observations, so that they do not now go in vain. Maybe somebody would like > to continue research, as this is quite an important thing to OSM. >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
