Hello, You can read about the correct way of attribution here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Where_to_put_it.3F and here https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
A sexta, 17/05/2019, 13:03, <[email protected]> escreveu: > Send talk mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of talk digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. correct (scholarly) attribution? (Frederik Ramm) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 19:30:47 +0200 > From: Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> > To: Talk Openstreetmap <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSM-talk] correct (scholarly) attribution? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hi, > > if someone writes a scientific paper and wants to reference an OSM data > set they used, what would be the correct way to do that? Typically such > mentions contain author and name of the work, and publication place and > year. Or maybe the web-like "retrieved on ..."? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > ------------------------------ > > End of talk Digest, Vol 177, Issue 13 > ************************************* >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
