To avoid hurting any sensibilities, I'd say this is maybe not the best way to go in its form. Why not organizing a kind of audit with a review process that would be coordinated? Otherwise I fear this page could just end up being a list for everybody pet rant. Yves
Le 29 mai 2019 00:46:42 GMT+02:00, Michael Reichert <osm...@michreichert.de> a écrit : >Hi, > >I started documenting controversial decisions by the maintainers of iD >at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions > >Currently, only the highway=footway and the nonsquare=yes issue are >mentioned. > >Please feel free to add other issues which have proofed controversial >so >far. Don't forget to summarise the opinion of the maintainer as well to >aim at least some neutrality as far as it is possible for those >involved >in the disputes. Please add links to relevant discussions as well. > >Best regards > >Michael > > >-- >Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten >ausgenommen) >I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
