So to confirm what you want... If someone wanted to use the panos in a video, stitched together with photos they took and narration about a hike, that video must be CC-BY-SA or the panos cannot be used, is that right?
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:58 AM Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hello Martin, > > > Yes, that sounds a good idea. > > > So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under > CC-SA, but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does > that sound acceptable? > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* 01 June 2019 08:25 > *To:* Nick Whitelegg > *Cc:* Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk > *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application > for hikers > > > > sent from a phone > > On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk> > wrote: > > Hello Kathleen and Milo, > > > Thanks! > > > No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to > ODbL. The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think > about it, it could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps > users to position them - so fine with the license change. > > > > maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas > and odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t > very suitable for individual photographs? > > Cheers, Martin >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
