Just an update on this, DJI now complies with the license now. they added the notice on the map https://www.dji.com/pt/mobile/flysafe/geo-map
this only proofs that companies do take seriously a letter from the licensor and OSMF should take action after companies ignore the requests from the contributors to comply. One fixed, few others company still need to do the same. A terça, 19/03/2019, 18:48, Nuno Caldeira <nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com> escreveu: > After more investigation noticed that the military facilities on OSM that > don't have name, also don't have a name on DJI also. If you search on OSM > the name of the facility based on DJI info they match... wonder why > Few users reporting that the geometry don't match in some countries (i > presume they simplified the geometry in polygon with X ammount of vertices) > or they have used other data. Compared the data from 10 EU countries and > they all match OSM. > > More evidence ( compare the geometries and the coordinates of the > vertices): > > Wrong military base name (in English) > OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555214494/history > DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/md51uwmdBUjSEtlI/www.dji.com > > Portugal > This Maritime Police station is wrongly tagged on OSM... is also on DJI > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444420317/history#map=19/39.42995/-9.22504&layers=N > DJI has it https://screenshots.firefox.com/CBdSziw1bg9Z58Fc/www.dji.com > > OTAN terminal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177395459/history > DJI exact same polygon > https://screenshots.firefox.com/LZKssfpGkmjULviX/www.dji.com > > Spain > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32635137#map=18/43.45274/-3.84917 > DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/589CWyXHvrolF7Fy/www.dji.com > > France > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365823093 > DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/K42sB4B5DalFx2Sr/www.dji.com > > Germany > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50156264 > DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/LzMBa9Jx0mvidAGP/www.dji.com > > Hungary - Notice the divisions betweent the different military facilties > that are split...same on DJI > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116800250/history > DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/vO7anIZe5EEJADcQ/www.dji.com > > > Às 11:42 de 19/03/2019, Nuno Caldeira escreveu: > > I don't see other data than airports in Taiwan. As I mentioned on the > initial, I'm talking about the military facilities and prisons, not > airports. China also don't have military facilities on their map, being a > Chinese company they probably filtered it. > > A terça, 19/03/2019, 11:28, Dennis Raylin Chen <b92612...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > >> Not in Taiwan. >> >> They just use the data release by the authorities. No data from >> OpenStreetMap. >> >> Dennis >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:55 AM Nuno Caldeira < >> nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Was curious where DJI managed to get a worldwide DB of polygons of >>> military facilities and points of prisons, triple checked with a couple of >>> other users of OSM at Telegram and with polygons i added seven years ago. >>> Without a doubt its from OSM, the coordinates of the vertices matches OSM >>> perfectly. The names are also the same... >>> >>> Check yourself, head to https://www.dji.com/pt/flysafe/geo-map select >>> your country, zoom in and check the data. Airports restriction areas seems >>> not to be OSM data, but from other source. >>> Share your examples if you will. >>> >>> Again, sadly no attribution... tried to request via Twitter >>> https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1105897635796447235 .... >>> silent as in moon why would they reply to a contributor blah. The Pandora >>> box has been opened with exceptions about the attribution, if other don't >>> attribute, why would they? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
