Just an update on this, DJI now complies with the license now. they added
the notice on the map https://www.dji.com/pt/mobile/flysafe/geo-map

this only proofs that companies do take seriously a letter from the
licensor and OSMF should take action after companies ignore the requests
from the contributors to comply.

One fixed, few others company still need to do the same.

A terça, 19/03/2019, 18:48, Nuno Caldeira <nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> After more investigation noticed that the military facilities on OSM that
> don't have name, also don't have a name on DJI also. If you search on OSM
> the name of the facility based on DJI info they match... wonder why
> Few users reporting that the geometry don't match in some countries (i
> presume they simplified the geometry in polygon with X ammount of vertices)
> or they have used other data. Compared the data from 10 EU countries and
> they all match OSM.
>
> More evidence ( compare the geometries and the coordinates of the
> vertices):
>
> Wrong military base name (in English)
> OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555214494/history
> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/md51uwmdBUjSEtlI/www.dji.com
>
> Portugal
> This Maritime Police station is wrongly tagged on OSM... is also on DJI
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444420317/history#map=19/39.42995/-9.22504&layers=N
> DJI has it https://screenshots.firefox.com/CBdSziw1bg9Z58Fc/www.dji.com
>
> OTAN terminal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177395459/history
> DJI exact same polygon
> https://screenshots.firefox.com/LZKssfpGkmjULviX/www.dji.com
>
> Spain
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32635137#map=18/43.45274/-3.84917
> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/589CWyXHvrolF7Fy/www.dji.com
>
> France
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365823093
> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/K42sB4B5DalFx2Sr/www.dji.com
>
> Germany
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50156264
> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/LzMBa9Jx0mvidAGP/www.dji.com
>
> Hungary - Notice the divisions betweent the different military facilties
> that are split...same on DJI
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116800250/history
> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/vO7anIZe5EEJADcQ/www.dji.com
>
>
> Às 11:42 de 19/03/2019, Nuno Caldeira escreveu:
>
> I don't see other data than airports in Taiwan. As I mentioned on the
> initial, I'm talking about the military facilities and prisons, not
> airports. China also don't have military facilities on their map, being a
> Chinese company they probably filtered it.
>
> A terça, 19/03/2019, 11:28, Dennis Raylin Chen <b92612...@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Not in Taiwan.
>>
>> They just use the data release by the authorities. No data from
>> OpenStreetMap.
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:55 AM Nuno Caldeira <
>> nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Was curious where DJI managed to get a worldwide DB of polygons of
>>> military facilities and points of prisons, triple checked with a couple of
>>> other users of OSM at Telegram and with polygons i added seven years ago.
>>> Without a doubt its from OSM, the coordinates of the vertices matches OSM
>>> perfectly. The names are also the same...
>>>
>>> Check yourself, head to https://www.dji.com/pt/flysafe/geo-map select
>>> your country, zoom in and check the data. Airports restriction areas seems
>>> not to be OSM data, but from other source.
>>> Share your examples if you will.
>>>
>>> Again, sadly no attribution... tried to request via Twitter
>>> https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1105897635796447235 ....
>>> silent as in moon why would they reply to a contributor blah. The Pandora
>>> box has been opened with exceptions about the attribution, if other don't
>>> attribute, why would they?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to