On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I strongly disagree with this idea, > > and multiple times changed such splits > > back to one way. > > I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth > information that your fellow mappers have gathered and encoded in the > database. > It is only vandalism if you loose information, if you are improving the mapping by changing such misleading information to correctly mapped turn lanes then it is improving the map.
Phil (trigpoint) > > > > > > Jul 4, 2019, 11:49 AM by [email protected]: > > > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via > > > talk > > > wrote: > > > > I've always had the impression we should not create separate > > > > traffic > > > > lanes unless "traffic flows are physically separated by a barrier > > > > (e.g., grass, concrete, steel), which prevents movements between > > > > said > > > > flows." > > > > > > A painted line that has the legal status of "do not cross" is a > > > perfectly fine reason to have a separate way. > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
