Hello, > “This edit was assisted by computer vision” > is useful metadata, no?
I use a lot of such datas (traffic sign from mapillary via osmose) I review it (viewing the picture myself) before any change to avoid some false positive and to improve localisation. who 'll made what if I add computer_vision_assisted changeset tag ? for stat ? why not. but in this case, it may also be needed to add humain_reviewed, humain_improved, integration_tools and so... currently I put source=mapillary source:date I see a lot of mappers unable to fill a source tag, for ex because a major editor doesn't promote enought a changeset source tag. it would probably be best to start by having at least the source tag everywhere before pushing for more secondary tags Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
