Yves,
Thank you. Everything is clear now.
Best regards,
Oleksiy
On 8/28/19 08:39, Yves wrote:
Oleksiy,
Those two changes are indeed very technical and are not related to
mapping.
https://postgis.net/docs/ST_PointOnSurface.html
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3756
Yves
Le 28 août 2019 08:13:13 GMT+02:00, Oleksiy Muzalyev
<oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch> a écrit :
Good morning,
Thank you for the information.
I did not understand these two changes. I would like to see an example
on the map or/and read a wiki article about the building label, the shop
label, and the ST_PointOnSurface.
In the two following articles:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
there is neither word "label", nor "ST_PointOnSurface". I would like to
learn about it and, probably, use it.
As for layers with attachments, - I guess it does not concern mapping
itself, but it's something related to a technical side of rendering.
Probably, a layer has got some PNG image files, which are used in icons
or displaying certain areas, and they will be cached in the visitors'
browsers.
Best regards,
Oleksiy (Alex-7 @ OSM)
On 8/28/19 06:57, Paul Norman via talk wrote:
>
Changes include - Shop label fixes and use ST_PointOnSurface
for building label placement This fixes some bugs and makes
building label placement consistent with shop label
placement. - Use `cache-feature: true` to improve performance
of layers with attachments ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
