> but also reaffirms that it supports the on-the-ground-rule I suggest to extend our manifesto [1] with the word "emphatic" ( adding after the list: Truthful, Legal, Verifiable, Relevant, +Emphatic )
With adding the "empathy" to the "on the ground rule" -> it is adding the extra layer of the meaning. Without "empathy" - we can map* "nesting locations of vulnerable species"* - because of the cold logic of the "*on the ground rule"* With "empathy" we can fix the side effects of cold logic, and we can make an "intelligent" decision [2] With "empathy" - it is easy to solve the diversity problems.[4] Without "empathy" - just with cold logic - it is impossible. With "empathy" - this sentence has a deeper meaning: *"OpenStreetMap values community cohesion over data perfection." [1] * and this is important for every organisation/community: *"Empathy deserves its buzzy status, and leaders are wise to desire it for their businesses. But to succeed in making it part of their organization’s DNA, they must pay close attention to how cultures build and change — organically, collectively, and often from the bottom up." [3]* And in the "Crimea situation" the empathy add an extra complexity .. What is the real meaning of the "Our community is based on mutual respect, tolerance ..." [4] in this case? [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map [2] Eugenia Cheng: "The Art of Logic: How to Make Sense in a World that Doesn't" https://youtu.be/YHZKX0H6cUE?t=2217 [3] https://hbr.org/2019/05/making-empathy-central-to-your-company-culture [4] proposed "Diversity Statement" *"Our community is based on mutual respect, tolerance ..."* ~ empathy https://gist.github.com/grischard/53e4e9defebe7912f3aab9c0d2d1b55a Best, Imre Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 6., Cs, 12:42): > As most of you will know, the DWG on 14 Nov 2018 had reconsidered its > original statement on Crimea from 5 June 2014, and decided to acknowledge > that on the ground, Russia was controlling the territory and that the > situation seemed fairly stable. On 10 December 2018, the OSMF board decided > to return to the 2014 resolution. In its reasoning, board refers to the > community as a whole ("The previous situation with the exception in place > was obviously much more acceptable to the OSM community as a whole"), but > also reaffirms that it supports the on-the-ground-rule: " > > We recognize that a lot of work has gone into the current Disputed Area > Policy, and both DWG and LWG have assured us that the "on the ground > rule" generally works well to avoid and settle conflicts. We, therefore, do > not want to weaken that policy." > > My belief is that the reason for the on-the-ground rule to exist, is > actually solving problems like the one in Crimea, and that we are weakening > our position as "neutral", global community, if we make any exceptions to > the rule. While I fully support the 2014 DWG resolution for the situation > of 2014 (indeed potentially unclear if it would be stable), I also agree > that in 2018 DWG couldn't decide differently than how they did. > > I therefore ask the current OSMF Board to reconsider the 2018 board > decision and put the updated DWG statement from Nov 2018 into effect. This > is not a question whether you believe, Crimea should belong to Ukraine or > Russia, it is a principal question of creating together a truely impartial > and indipendent map and adhering to our own standards. > > Like the former OSMF board, the DWG and LWG, I do not want to weaken that > policy. > > Cheers > Martin > > > > _________ > > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea > > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2019-February/005972.html > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
