The one I am thinking of comes from HOT activity. There is no link to an
import proposal, they just use 'any tag they like' .. and leave it there
undocumented.
On 17/3/20 8:59 pm, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi all
My 2cts : "in use" status and statuslink to the import proposal would
be enough, right?
Point is to determine where does the tag come from, and it's done by
statuslink, not status which reflect the current state of use.
All the best
François
Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 10:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote:
Hello Joseph,
it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done.
I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a
keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed, error, ...
it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error,
but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example to
follow.
Agree with both.
Possible values?
obsolete
abandoned
discarded
<https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
archaic
passe
stale
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
