On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 17:52 Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:56 Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 15:18 Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Yesterday I took my first try at using osm2pgsql on a pbm file and, >> > too late, I realized I didn't take full advantage of the server's >> > large RAM and multi-core capability. >> ... >> Okay, I'm making progress, thanks to you all. > > > But got stopped again running out of space trying to import > north-america-latest.osm.pbf (approx 10 Gb pbm file). > > I had a 256 Gg SSD added and moved both the osm user and the postgresql > data files to it. The failure was at approx 147 Gb pgsql and 60 Gb osm. > > So, which should I move away? If I had my choice I would keep the pg on > SSD for serving, but is there enough space? > It looks like I may have hit a sweet spot in my blundering (fingers crossed). The process is still running. The Pg on the 240 Gb SSD is taking 150 Gb and, finally, relations are being processed. -Tom >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
