I support your nomination. You're a really good candidate for it. I would propose myself, but I don't, as I have almost zero experience with using iD.
Polyglot On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 06:47 Roland Olbricht <roland.olbri...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > first of all I'm glad to read that the board addresses the sudden > funding hole for iD, and does in addition care about the critique around > iD. > > I would like to self-nominate for the software dispute resolution panel. > > For my understanding of the task please (re-)read > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2020-June/006909.html > tl;dr: There is no silver bullet, hence no team of experts is going to > find one. Conflict resolution is painful work for all involved, but it > also likely to yield insight and an improved software. I see a panel's > member's job in encouraging the involved people to keep walking through > the resolution process. > > I also promise resp. reserve the right to share or paraphrase (for the > purpse of removing personal issues) all communications regarding the > nomination process. There have been concerns about whether the > nomination process is balanced and being open is the best way to address > them. On a personal note: I have no doubts it is, and the artifacts we > currenty encounter are consistent with a board intensely keeping many > trains in their rails in parallel. > > Regarding potential CoI: > - I develop the Overpass API but it is intentionally tag agnostic. > - I do not plan to put the Overpass API under the panel regime. > Thus, I do not expect any CoI from my contributions as developer to > OpenStreetMap. > > Best regards, > Roland > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
