I wasn't saying you should import it. You were disputing about which
dataset was more accurate. The County GIS is usually the best. You could
compare the 2 in dispute, and use the county data to settle the argument.
Many TIGER Lines are better now but in the past have been greatly
scorned for how inaccurate they were.
On 8/18/2020 9:39 PM, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano
<zelonew...@gmail.com>:
All,
I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town
(Wheeling, IL) using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data
source, and re-used all of the original boundary relations.
Unfortunately it appears that all of Cook County needs to be
updated to reflect the county GIS data (found here:
https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/boundary-open-data).
Those census polygons are fairly close, but different. The two
border towns I checked just north in Lake County appear to line up
perfectly with the Cook County data so this might just be a Cook
County issue. This is a start but there's lots of work to do there.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:10 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us
<talk...@openstreetmap.org
<//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2...@openstreetmap.org>>
wrote:
lines no relations yes
Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
<miketh...@gmail.com
<//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amiketh...@gmail.com>>:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via
Talk-us <talk...@openstreetmap.org
<http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2...@openstreetmap.org>>
wrote:
i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
and it is not a polygon,
As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect,
be polygons, in other words, they have to close.
and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke
and did it all by hand.
The boundary relation (126598) is currently broken. for
one thing, it doesn't close at the location of
Williamsberg Square residential area.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
<http:///compose?To=talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org
<//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2...@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org </compose?To=talk%2...@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
