Can you give an example of something that would follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice and still would not fulfill ODBL?
I see no obvious loopholes there. Dec 7, 2020, 22:57 by r...@technomancy.org: > It's good to see more discussion on this. I like that this document lays out > the moral requirment to attribute. We don't ask for any money, but we do ask > you to attribute us. It's a very good bargain. > > But I think this attribution is too vague. It's advice seems to restate the > relevant section from the ODbL. There are many examples of poor attribution > where someone could argue that they meet this standard. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, at 21:41, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > >> I appreciate the wik page "Community attribution advice" which was made >> by another community member. It seems to give good advice about how >> database users can comply with the attribution guidelines in a way that >> everybody* in this community can support. >> >> Please review the page and make any comments for improvement if needed: >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice >> >> -- Joseph Eisenberg >> >> (*Note that "everybody" does not include the interests of corporations, >> which are not persons, but rather the interests of individual mappers >> and database users) >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
