> While my presentation balisage this year was on this topic exactly - how to > get JSON and XML to be nice friends ... > > http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol7/html/Lee01/BalisageVol7-Lee01.html
Very interesting! Did you address the issue of XML with mixed content typically found in more document based approaches, e.g. <p>hello <b>world</b> its a nice day</p>, I scanned the paper but not come across an example. I may have missed something? > I am somewhat concerned about "Fixing" JSON by adding things XML has (like > XSD, XSLT etc ...) > > by the time we add everything to JSON to make as useful as XML it will be as > complicated as XML, > > and then we'll be having discussions about "Micro JSON". Indeed. > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > David A. Lee > > [email protected] > > http://www.xmlsh.org > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Francis Upton > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 6:10 PM > To: xquery-discuss Talk > Subject: Re: [xquery-talk] JSON query processing > > > > P.S. the first one who has the courage to say that XML and JSON should > co-exist > non only peacefully, but in close harmony, has all my respects. (I think so, > but I didn't dare to say it publicly :-) > > I will say it. I think JSON is a nice syntax and can be more compact and > readable than XML. Last I looked (which was a while ago), they did not have > any standard means of specification (like XSD), so that needs to be fixed. > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
