I was honored to have Richard Feynman as a professor in collage at Caltech and 
actually hand-grade a paper of mine which
sits collecting mold in my basement.  Oh how smart I thought I was then ... but 
he had patience and kindness and actually tried to help me focus my ideas.   
What a rare and amazing man.
I found him one of the few "hi-faluten" academics who was not entirely full of 
himself.   He always questioned reality.
But as Jim wrote, I am confused what you are talking about ?
What kind of science are you asking for that isnt being done  ? Who should do 
it ?  Who will pay for it ?
And sorry I didn't read all your links but where did "Gods Will" come from ?  I 
have never read God publish an article on XQuery.
I am totally confused (and also don't care about being politically correct.  
Feynman was honorable in refusing the nobel prize reward ).

Now for a blatant promotion ...
Have 5 minutes to contribute to the "Science" of XML and JSON Processing in 
Browsers ?
Do you want to help eliminate wives tales and FUD and replace it with 
scientific repeatable experiment and data ?
Want to help the next generation of not-yet-brainwashed software developers 
have real data to base their decisions ?
Just go here on as many devices as you have patience for.
The results will be published in either peer-reviewed publication or my own 
blog ... whichever accepts me.

http://speedtest.xmlsh.org




----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.xmlsh.org

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
daniela florescu
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 8:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [xquery-talk] why do you care what other people think ?

I have to apologize on this mailing list first for completely scaring one of 
potential XQuery's customers a couple of days back.
(he never answered back... oups... I will always wonder if he solved his 
problem...)

Sorry. This was not my intent.

But in my defense, maybe it is not that bad.

Maybe it is a bigger lesson in this tense discussion. Maybe such tense 
discussions are necessary.

In my defense, unfortunately the first book my father gave me to read just 
after I learned reading was this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Do_You_Care_What_Other_People_Think%3F  
(...and
apparently I never recovered, and I have no hope of developing a politically 
correct character in science. Oups !
But I wish ALL kids in the world read this as their first fairy tale book as 
they grow up .... I think this would make the
world a MUCH happier place ..:-)

====

As the result of this (good/bad!?) education I received, the words "God's will" 
in general make me uncomfortable.
But  HECK, when "God's will" is in the same sentence  with "XQuery query 
optimization", hell.

It does FREAK ME OUT.

Maybe it is time to do something.


Is there ANYTHING we can do to turn this community into some scientifically 
driven community  (... and not driven by fake "gods" because
you know them first hand and you had a beer with them, or because they write 
longer essays) ?

This is not how science works.

If anything, this community will be fundamental in a major revolution that is 
happening now. Data Science, Open Data Initiative, to name a few
of this new "keywords".

Just read here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/obama-administration-releases-historic-open-data-rules-enhance-governmen

or here

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/education/edlife/universities-offer-courses-in-a-hot-new-field-data-science.html?_r=2&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer&utm_content=buffer66834&;

(hey, "data scientist is the sexiest job of the 21 century"... how cool is that 
:?)_

======

Very likely the data will flow in this new data-centric world in either JSON or 
XML.

Hence, whoever will need the data, will need to process it, and hence will need 
to know what this community knows.

But if we want to be taken seriously, we need to reframe this community on a 
new basis.

A more scientific one.

Best regards,
Dana








_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to