I like github, but its git (or generically distributed source control) that I like
articles like this http://thehackernews.com/2013/11/github-accounts-compromised-in-massive.html have me researching the path Eric van der Vlist<http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/> has charted http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2013/11/06/from-trac-to-gitlab/ with gitlab ... so far my experience mirrors his and I can setup the security as well (or bad) as I like. Jim Fuller On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Adam Retter <[email protected]>wrote: > Actually I like that GitHub just expects 'tags' and 'milestones' > because this is all that you need to integrate with your release > management tools. I think here the 'less if more' approach is > brilliant. We use several systems together for our release management > but ultimately its all Maven at the root. > > On 25 November 2013 14:53, John Snelson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Github's pretty good - I used this to become familiar with Git (your life > > will get better ;-)): > > > > http://ftp.newartisans.com/pub/git.from.bottom.up.pdf > > > > The main issue I have is it's lack of release management support. And > yes, > > unlike HTML 5 I do believe having release checkpoints benefits users. :-) > > > > With a dig at HTML 5, I think this thread is now back on topic, right? > > > > John > > > > > > On 25/11/2013 14:42, Michael Sokolov wrote: > >> > >> On 11/25/2013 09:23 AM, David Lee wrote: > >>> > >>> I am so annoyed by this thread and the associated links which seem to > >>> clear the FUD > >>> > >>> > http://www.gluster.org/2013/08/how-far-the-once-mighty-sourceforge-has-fallen/ > >>> > >> ... > >>> > >>> > >>> Do I need (want to?) learn "git" ? and move to github ? My "Git" > >>> experience so far has been disappointing (I cant figure it out ! The > >>> model makes no sense and I never know if stuff is checked in or not) > >>> I have some projects on google code which has been sufficient and > >>> trustworthy as sites go ... but it has that "google owns you" > >>> creepiness factor. > >>> > >> David, I researched these options a year or so ago and concluded it was > >> time to learn git/github; however lack of good support for hosting large > >> binaries kind of forces you to host those elsewhere. Google code seems > >> like the other main option. I wonder if there isn't a possibility SF > >> will right the ship, though? > >> > >> About git: you can use git more-or-less like svn, although there are > >> definitely extra steps. One thing I have come to really like about it > >> is the ability to commit changes without immediately sharing them with > >> the world (you commit, and then push, as two steps). You could do this > >> with svn branches, kind of, but they seem so heavyweight and I never > >> really use them as much as perhaps I should. I do find myself searching > >> stackoverflow every so often when I get into weird git situations. > >> > >> -Mike > >> _______________________________________________ > >> [email protected] > >> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > > -- > > John Snelson, Lead Engineer http://twitter.com/jpcs > > MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] > > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > -- > Adam Retter > > skype: adam.retter > tweet: adamretter > http://www.adamretter.org.uk > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
