Alexis. It's obvious that you don't stand around letting your face get slapped. Neither do I. But in my post I did go to the trouble of deliberately not attributing names to the thoughts I disagreed with. I really didn't want to insult the author, rather just his concept. Obviously something with which you have no trouble. You also took a lot of space replying to something which had nothing to do with my post. I did not indicate my position as a modernist or traditionalist. In fact I like both. Most accurately I could be described as a segregationalist. tut, tut. (at least on the subject of Tango). The fact that one subscribes to one style or the other should not necessitate a derogatory labeling of them, which is how I read the post I referred to. An all too simplistic assessment of why one would choose a particular style of Tango. It seems to me a pity you cast yourself into this category by subscribing to the view.
Anton _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
