Alexis Cousein wrote: "You like pigeon holes to put people in, don't you?"
Why pigeon hole something Tango when it isn't? Why call anything anything? Why don't we call it the no-pigeon hole dance and it's practioners no-pigeon holers? Or is that pigeon-holing it? What a load of pigeon dung. Thank heavens that in the real world, most of us still call a spade a spade. Anton -----Original Message----- From: tango-l-boun...@mit.edu [mailto:tango-l-boun...@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Alexis Cousein Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 8:05 PM Cc: tango-L@mit.edu Subject: Re: [Tango-L] What Do You Think? Alex Long wrote: > Hola List! > > Wading in here on the tail end, with nothing profound, just one > observation...on the heels of Trini's last message about "cutting the apron > strings"... > > It seems the Nuevoists desperately want to call what they do "Tango", when > it looks and must feel less and less like Tango. As do the > blues/fusion/tango folks, the Swango folks, the salsa/tango folks, and the > list goes on. You like pigeon holes to put people in, don't you? _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list Tango-L@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l _______________________________________________ Tango-L mailing list Tango-L@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l