> I'm just a user, but in my use of Tapestry so far, I've always preferred to > think of a listener as a method and not an object... I find it easier that > way. I like to ignore the fact that Tapestry automatically creates hidden > objects for me. Of course, someday I might want that feature, but I don't > think this enhancement would get in the way. > > -Nathan
This /is/ an interesting question... I'm curious, Howard, because I have made some use of the fact that listeners are objects... I assume this is still kosher with the new changes? Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
